This analysis uses the Spotify 2023 dataset to explain song streams with audio features and categorical predictors. Since stream counts vary across a very large range, the model uses log(streams) as the response so the problem fits a linear regression scale more naturally.
Data Preparation
Some numeric columns in the raw dataset contain commas and are imported as character values. The project first defines a to_num() helper, removes commas, converts values to numeric, and keeps complete observations before fitting:
The main predictors include bpm, key, mode, danceability_%, valence_%, energy_%, acousticness_%, instrumentalness_%, and speechiness_%.
Model Design
The preliminary model is a multiple linear regression with an additional mode:valence_percent interaction. The idea is that musical mode may change how valence relates to streaming performance.
The project is not only about fitting a model; it is about checking whether the model is trustworthy. The diagnostic workflow includes:
Residuals vs Fitted: checks whether residuals show visible structure.
Normal Q-Q: checks whether the normal error assumption is roughly reasonable.
Scale-Location: looks for non-constant variance.
Residuals vs Leverage: combines leverage with Cook's Distance to identify influential points.
These plots help detect systematic bias, heteroskedasticity, and unusually influential observations.
Collinearity
Another important issue is that predictors may be strongly related to each other. The project uses auxiliary regressions and VIF checks to diagnose collinearity. energy_percent, valence_percent, and acousticness_percent deserve special attention because they may overlap in how they describe mood and sound texture.
Model Evaluation
The model is evaluated with summary(), ANOVA, confidence intervals, AIC/BIC, and 10-fold cross validation. Cross validation matters because it moves the analysis beyond training-set fit and asks whether the model can still explain unseen songs.
Takeaway
The most valuable part of this project is the full modeling workflow: cleaning data, transforming variables, specifying the model, diagnosing assumptions, checking collinearity, and validating performance. A stronger analysis is not only about higher R-squared; it should explain why the model is built this way, where assumptions may fail, and how the next version could improve.